8. Experimenting and reasoning within the limits of knowledge, using man as an immediate instrument, with his whole social significance, resulted in several conclusions which by extrapolation yielded a certain image of the world. Then the world would appear more profound than the universe we inhabit and which we have regarded as existence. The substances in the profundities of the world do not appear as having their own consciousness. However, the world inheres not only the profundities, but also universe(space-time)-existences, which are in compliance with the laws inscribed through the informatter. Such an existence is defined by in-space and in-time development and possibly by consciousness which springs from a development, diversification process. Consciousness is both a product of matter and a factor acting on matter. This accounts for man's and society's power over nature, for their imaginative and creative abilities and for the modelling and change of matter in compliance with their thought. Born of the development of the world, man and society will tend to build, to create, to perfect and beautify. They will oppose that development fending towards disintegration and will attempt to restrict a like development by their tendency to master the matter. Couldn't we imagine through the coordinate of the orthoexistence that we might also inhere a cosmic society, and that all this society will be able to decide by their creative thought the programming of an existence governed by distinct laws as soon as the knowledge acquired by society would have come to some perfection?
Let us now observe that the essays in this volume should be taken as some foregoing laboratory notes. After an independent approach of existence and not-existence, one can easily observe that some 2,500 years ago Parmenides and other ancient philosophers proceeded along the same line. For the human mind works similarly or almost similarly up to certain point, and as a view on existence is built into an articulate whole, the immediate question is how correct, how faithful this view is and what its connection to, or importance for, the practice of man and societyare.
The role of the unity of knowledge and practice or, otherwise stated, the role of praxis in philosophy is no doubt a notable gain of the human thought. The praxis bears on the philosophical projection on existence. Indeed, to get energy, to process and transform substance and lately information, to produce and to investigate, to invent and to create - all these activities are also markedly philosophical in their nature. Radu Florian alleges that praxis is a fundamental relation in Marxian philosophy: "Praxis... is the existence mode of society as an objective system .... Practical undertaking is no doubt functionally decisive in the whole praxis, but this does not mean that the spiritual trait of reality, as an instance and constituent of praxis, were less important. In this case, one overlooks that the practical undertaking embraces the varied results of the subject's awareness, that a practical undertaking cannot exists in defect of the spiritual trait of reality".3 The philosophical experiment may be carried out by any man, either individually or in a social context, as a part of the social reality. That man is socially and historically determined is beyond doubt. Each human being is both an instance in a social-historical wave and an instance in the onflowing self-cognition of matter and the associated exertion of his consciousness on the matter.

In this chapter, we have reverted to the profundities of the world in the light of which the philosophical infinitude can be more appropriately understood as an infinite potentiality of the matter to manifest itself. As we have already seen, the space-time existence with respect to the orthoexistence induces the idea of philosophical infinitude in our mental structures but this idea has been for a long time mistaken for a form of mathematical infinitude.
In a more concise formulation, man's conscious activity and his ability to know the world are the basic core of a philosophical projection.
This projection may be corrected by solving some of the associated questions. Let us also note in addition that this projection should not be taken as truth-revealing. It is just a hypothesis.
It is obvious that new philosophical projections are needed so as to keep up the philosophical tension of our life. Likewise, the systems of social and human values and civilization as a natural complement to the social system are inconceivable if we dispense with these philosophical projections.

Present-day science raises questions so difficult that their solution is unlikely without resorting to philosophical work and new hypotheses. Regarding the brain as a device, we should observe how it cogitates on the most primitive concepts concerning the world qua over-all existence, or just the space-time existence. It may be said that what the brain actually cogitates is a socially induced cogitation, and hence it does not mirror its inherent properties. This is largely true, but the brain is also endowed with a great imaginative ability and cogitation, and is also dependent on its own biological, physical structures. The exertions of cogitation-herein referred to as philosophical experiment-commence with what is determined by the physical structures, cogitation proceeds with what is individually generated under the free play of imagination. Cogitation will however tent to work prevailingly at the beginning of this track. Indeed, we are approaching the philosophical experiment with no previous model of the world, and address our mental structures under no linguistic or mathematical formulation, and recording the answer. To be unable to cogitate, to imagine, to have a feeling of, or to live the nothing assumes the value of experimental fact, though it is likewise a cogitating act. To have a feeling of, to live and to cogitate beingness is also a fact of experiments that may dispense with the concepts of space and time. When we resort to these notions and inquire about their infinitude, the brain reaction is multi-fold: physical-phenomenological, mathematical and philosophical. The physical-phenomenological reaction of our mental structures is the sole philosophical experiment, notwithstanding the weakness lent to the concepts of space and time by the human empeiria. However, these three philosophical experiments permit us to build a general model of the world, which responds to the present-day concerns in science.
Man has always questioned existence but he has never ventured to seek an orthoexistence. Being used to work with mechanical images, y compris space-time images, he strayed from the profundities of the material world.
Man's philosophical dimensions are thus obvious. They are not the outcome of his imagination. Instead, they spring from some basic facts related to brain functioning during cogitation, which subsequently grow in scope via social life and all that adds his knowledge. That is why man's philosophical dimensions are at work in his daily activities, in his consciousness and in his designs.


The Philosophical Experiment 92